Difference between domestic violence dating violence
When assessing for dating abuse, it is important to meet young people at where they are clarifying any terms used to describe being in a romantic partnership, or having sexual contact, and stating a number of examples of various tactics of abuse.A study published in 2010, for example, recommends pediatricians and school health providers must inquire about behaviors, not identity, to determine teens’ risk for contracting a sexually transmitted infection; similarly, when assessing for abuse, as a best practice, behaviors ought to be the main subject of inquiry.It is also evident that many service providers and institutions (such as law enforcement, prosecutors and judges) that interact with teens have limited knowledge of complex abuse dynamics in all intimate-partner relationships, as well as limited knowledge in collaborating on ongoing safety strategies with and for teen victims.
Additionally, many teen and adult victims alike experience abuse which intersects with discrimination and institutional biases based on race, culture, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, immigration status, and language barriers among others, that make abuse harder to overcome and create additional challenges to receiving desperately needed services.
As identified in the background section, rural programs report that transportation, parental consent, and the lack of teen-specific services often prevent youth from engaging in services.
Another issue is lack of access to technology (such as on reservations and remote areas in Alaska) which prevents teens from accessing chat lines or hotlines.
In the current social climate abuse amongst teenagers often manifests itself primarily as coercive control and through digital or electronic mechanisms.
These forms of abuse are often challenging to identify because they are extremely normalized in society and at the same time, inherently more private.