The same phrase occurs in Ge 46:8, where it likewise introduces a list of the names of those Israelites “who went to Egypt with Jacob” (1:1).Thus Exodus was not intended to exist separately, but was thought of as a continuation of a narrative that began in Genesis and was completed in Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy.the name given to the book by those who translated it into Greek.The word means “exit,” “departure” (see Lk ; Heb ).The covenant at Sinai is but another step in God’s fulfillment of his promise to the patriarchs (–17; 6:2–8; 19:3–8).
The raids may have been initiated by later Israelite armies, or by Philistines or other outsiders.
In addition, although Egyptian chronology relating to the 18th dynasty remains somewhat uncertain, some recent research tends to support the traditional view that two of this dynasty’s pharaohs, Thutmose III and his son Amunhotep II, were the pharaohs of the oppression and the exodus respectively (see notes on,23; ).
On the other hand, the appearance of the name Rameses in has led many to the conclusion that the 19th-dynasty pharaoh Seti I and his son Rameses II were the pharaohs of the oppression and the exodus respectively.
Furthermore, archaeological evidence of the destruction of numerous Canaanite cities in the 13th century b.c.
has been interpreted as proof that Joshua’s troops invaded the promised land in that century.